About

I am Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at Monmouth University.

I work in religion with a focus on the ways in which critical theory and ethnographic approaches can provide new orientations for social analysis, ethics and interdisciplinary conversation. I was trained in ethnographic method by the philosophical anthropologist, Michael Jackson. I have an abiding interest in the critical work ethnography can do at the intersections of religion, science and global capitalism.

My ethnographic methodology blends participant-observation, formal interviews, discourse analysis and critical self-reflection. In my work, I draw from phenomenology, existential philosophy, critical theory, pragmatism, post-structualism and genealogy, testing and evaluating the practical usefulness and inadequacies of conceptual tools in light of the changing demands which lived contexts necessarily place on all theory. A primary interest in intersubjectivity and the relationship of academic work to other forms of labor informs this approach

My first major research project focused on the recent ‘spiritual turn’ taken by organizational management and what this turn of events can tell us about the shape-shifting qualities of a contemporary global and cybernetic capitalism that seem to unsettle the modernist binaries (secular/religious; economic/affective; instrumental/aesthetic) that characterized Max Weber’s descriptions of modernity. Having conducted ethnographic research with a group of ‘spiritual reformers’ of capitalism who blend theology and management theory in their work, I looked specifically at the ways in which the metaphors of a networked capitalism are reiterated in practice, reproducing and personalizing the global imaginary of contemporary capitalism.

Under Jackson’s supervision, I began to work on and continue to work on an interdisciplinary methodology for the study of religion and society that shares Michel Foucault’s “archaeological” appreciation for the patterns of thought that cut across institutions and disciplines within discrete and specific epistemic contexts, focusing on the reproduction in practice of patterns of socially available metaphor. However, as a way of mitigating against the structuralist excesses that underwrite Foucault’s archaeological work, my ethnographic approach borrows heavily from phenomenology, pragmatism and existentialism and maintains an abiding and central interest in issues of agency, biography and intentionality. I look to explore and better comprehend the ways in which social rules are lived out, inhabited, challenged and altered in practice.

Having published a paper on the conceptual correspondences that exist between branding theory and Catherine Bell’s account of ritualization, I am scheduled to begin new ethnographic work with a radical performance troupe in late 2016 and will explore my interests in ‘spirituality’, ritualization, performativity, performance and agency by way of the empirical analysis.

Other general areas of interest are theories and methods in the study of religion, religious ethics, philosophy of religion, social and civil religion, secular and economic rituals, ritual theory, contemporary New Thought literature, social inequality, Latino/a religions, the religious experiences and lives of migrants and marginalized workers in the U.S., the religious experiences and lives of institutional elites in the U.S., religion and gender, religion and race, the Frankfurt School of critical theory and religion, sociology of religion; anthropology of religion, and new religious movements (NRMs).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s